Comments on: World’s Smallest LED Wristwatch

By: 65a061a4c15dee03a64c

65a061a4c15dee03a64c — Mon, 17 Dec 2007 06:26:14 +0000

65a061a4c15dee03a64c…

65a061a4c15d…

By: b0unce

b0unce — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:29:02 +0000

that looks awesome

By: Dexter Kanuto

Dexter Kanuto — Fri, 20 Oct 2006 02:51:42 +0000

Time is going fast as usual. The watch should take a ‘split-eye’ glimpse to tell time. Don’t blink because hell it’s gonna b damn way slow.

By: Lenka

Lenka — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:05:56 +0000

I agree with GameDudeX
“Idea is cool, implementation sucks.”

By: risingimstar

risingimstar — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:49:17 +0000

haha, this is a reeeal geek watch.

i can only imagine myself trying to figure out the time when i’m in a rush.

hey kineda, your blog roxs by the way… :)

By: razi

razi — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:04:33 +0000

I think it has to go slow so that there’s a pause in between the hour and minutes.

By: YoungGoGetter

YoungGoGetter — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:50:25 +0000

Just because the animated GIF shows it going slow doesn’t mean the actual watch does. If the LED’s were faster and I knew that for sure, I’d be a buyer!

By: haz

haz — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:31:19 +0000

thanks for the link, i like the other wathes available

By: paddyspoint

paddyspoint — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:56:27 +0000

watches are on the decline since cellphones arrived since both are competitor goods. why carry a watch if you have one in your phone? the reason for most people to wear watches is because it is a fashion accessory/ utility. i guess this watch just proves this point. time never looked so good!

By: David

David — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:45:27 +0000

For the price you would be buying it, I doubt it. Idea is nice, but the price tag can be lowered but thats just imo.